[OAM-talk] centralized hosting

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Tue Dec 8 08:52:30 MST 2009


Mikel,

Thanks for your candid response.  If OAM changes its mind, or reaches the
point where it is able to start accepting nodes, please let me know.

Anthony

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Anthony .. I'd be very happy for OAM to use the infrastructure you're
> talking about it. If it's so easy to find massive cheap hosting, consider
> yourself empowered to investigate the option. Once you have something solid
> for the community and the new steering committee to evaluate, let them know.
>
>
> I still think the community consensus is that the architecture of OAM
> should be set up in a decentralized way, for processing and hosting. Even if
> there are a couple mega-nodes, we still need the flexibility in case
> resources change.
>
> Thanks
> Mikel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openaerialmap.org/pipermail/talk_openaerialmap.org/attachments/20091208/3b9cae0a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the talk mailing list