[OAM-talk] Completing the OAM PSC election process

[Josh Livni]

Happy to recuse myself, but I also think it would be useful for the existing
psc to vote on the remaining X number of members, whether they are made up
of current nominees or otherwise... this will help ensure all psc members
have the support of at least a few people

 -Josh


On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Schuyler Erle <schuyler at nocat.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:39 -0500, Schuyler Erle wrote:
> > Now, maybe 10 PSC members is starting to get a little unwieldy, but
> > perhaps it would be simplest to start there. Consensus decision making
> > works best with smaller numbers, but you can go up to about a dozen and
> > still have it still work, if everyone's committed to the process.
>
> Jeff Johnson has pointed out to me that there were 11 nominees.
> Apparently I can't count. :) I still like the idea of allowing nominees
> to recuse themselves in order to keep the PSC down to a reasonable
> number, and then appointing the rest. I'll volunteer, for one. If anyone
> else cares to, then we're down to the original proposed count of nine.
>
> SDE
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openaerialmap.org
> http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openaerialmap.org/pipermail/talk_openaerialmap.org/attachments/20091208/a870f04c/attachment.html>