[OAM-talk] Moving forward (was: Completing the OAM PSC electionprocess)

[Mike Swope]

I will add it's easy to get the USGS data, you just need to send them the HD
(within their specs) and they will dump data on it and send it back. I can
send someone the email I got from them regarding this (prefer not to put it
on the list at the moment). I will add that the DOQQs were 16.5 TB or
something like that. They didnt have size estimates on the other imagery, as
you needed to request the area, and they would tell you how much data it
would be. I don't think it would be wise for everyone for everyone to ask
for the data. It seems that just splitting up the work would be the best
idea.

-Mike

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:

> 2009/12/10 Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com>
>
>> The cache could be 6-8x the size of the original data ... if the raw
>> data were in a compressed format like MrSID ... even bigger. So, for
>> every  1.5Tb disk that was sent, you need to return a stack more. Not
>> sure thats practical?
>>
>
> No.  I figured you'd send me extra goodies that I won't send back.
>
> IOW, send 6-8 people the same data, with instructions on which 1/6 to 1/8
> to process.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openaerialmap.org
> http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openaerialmap.org/pipermail/talk_openaerialmap.org/attachments/20091210/2c7b9d93/attachment.html>